From 8c6104e8bca567f0b61861d968f746ed4b466e92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yohan Boniface <yb@enix.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 16:38:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [mod] Do not make Representative an abstract model for now
It's not possible to have a ForeignKey pointing on an abstract model,
so we have two options to keep Representative: keep in asbtract, and make
mandatory to define one and just one class that inherit from it ; have it
non abstract, and so having the possibilty to create serveral classes that
inherit from Representative, but so it means that all requests will have a
JOIN between the two tables
---
representatives/models.py | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/representatives/models.py b/representatives/models.py
index 3c79549..37ebfc2 100644
--- a/representatives/models.py
+++ b/representatives/models.py
@@ -31,12 +31,9 @@ class Representative(models.Model):
birth_date = models.DateField(blank=True, null=True)
cv = models.TextField(blank=True, null=True)
- class Meta:
- abstract = True
-
class Contact(models.Model):
- representative = models.ForeignKey("Representative")
+ representative = models.ForeignKey(Representative)
class Meta:
abstract = True
@@ -92,4 +89,4 @@ class Mandate(models.Model):
# Sometimes begin_date and end_date are not available
active = models.NullBooleanField(default=False)
- representative = models.ForeignKey("Representative")
+ representative = models.ForeignKey(Representative)
--
GitLab